An archaeologist discovers new evidence suggesting humans inhabited a particular area long before it was originally believed to be inhabited. Because these results are so novel, if the archaeologist is critically thinking, she should first:

If an archaeologist discovers new evidence suggesting that humans inhabited an area before it was believed to have been inhabited, the archaeologist must first critically evaluate the work of other archaeologists who argue otherwise.

In this way, the archaeologist would be able to find points of agreement and disagreement in research already carried out to proceed with his study and then carry out additional tests on the evidence found.

Importance of the scientific method

The scientific method is a set of rules that must be followed to produce proven scientific knowledge. Therefore, the method provides value and reliability to the research, protecting the researcher's subjectivity.

Therefore, when discovering new evidence about a topic, a researcher must critically evaluate the scientific material already produced to carry out new tests to prove its evidence.

The correct answer is:

First critically evaluate the work of other archaeologists who argue otherwise.

Find out more information about scientific method here:

https://brainly.com/question/17216882