Answer:
The whole thing is a flaw itself.
Explanation:
1. Verdicts can be made without evidence.
2. Impartiality is not always in a adversarial system.
3. " As an accused is not compelled to give evidence in a criminal adversarial proceeding, they may not be questioned by a prosecutor or judge unless they choose to do so." This is a huge flaw since the criminal could be hiding something , and if he does, (under oath) and manages to get away with it, they are just exploiting the system its self. very rare on the other hand though.
4.it is mostly argument based and not evidence prone.
5. The whole system its self is a tedious procedure, lack of evidence, and unclear testimonies lead to serious mistake in the court verdict.
