(3)In his hand he carried a wonderful hammer which always had come back to his hand when he threw it. How can sentence (3) be written to eliminate wordiness and redundancy without changing its original meaning? A) The sentence is fine as is. B) In his hand he carried a wonderful hammer. C) He carried a hammer that returned to him when he threw it. D) In his hand he carried a wonderful hammer that always returne

Respuesta :

I believe the correct answer is C) He carried a hammer that returned to him when he threw it. 

It is the only option that keeps all the essential elements of the sentence, without changing its meaning, but cuts out enough words to make it shorter and less redundant. 
If we go by exclusion:
A) is not correct because in this case we don't want to keep the sentence as it is.
B) We are missing part of the sentence, the one about the hammer coming back.
D) Wonderful is an adjective that is not necessary to keep the meaning of the sentence and thus can be removed. 
This is why C) is the correct answer.

Answer:

C) He carried a hammer that returned to him when he threw it.

ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE