Why did constitutional monarchy develop in England, while absolute monarchy continued in Russia? and explain why (5 points)
Select one:
a. England was more economically developed than Russia and didn’t rely on a strong monarch to address the nation’s issues.
b. Russian monarchs like Peter the Great increased the power of the nobility, while English monarchs like Elizabeth I refused to consult with the English Parliament.
c. Russian monarchs deeply resented the intrusion of religious authorities into affairs of state, while English monarchs believed they owed allegiance to the head of the Church.
d. Russia thrived economically under absolute monarchs, while England relied on a struggling Parliament

The correct answer is A) England was more economically developed than Russia and didn't rely on a strong monarch to address the nation's issues.
I hope this helps.

Answer Link

bratislava bratislava · Answer 2 · 2019-12-29T07:53:33+01:00

Answer:

a. England was more economically developed than Russia and didn’t rely on a strong monarch to address the nation’s issues.

Explanation:

The constitutional monarchy is a sovereign power that is exercised to show authority in accordance to the written laws and rules and was followed in England and is based on an older system of the Magna cartar and the Russian were economically less developed as compared to the great Britain and has to rely on absolute monarchy system.