WILL MARK FIRST PERSON TO ANSWER BRAINLIEST!!!!! Using facts, explain whether the assemblies’ views were typical or atypical for Russian peasants at the time.

During this period, with the war dragging on and with the former hardships aggravated by army officers attempting to seize power, the Bolshevik Party, in spite of persecution by the Kerensky government, was carrying on active propaganda in favour of peace, the giving of the land to the peasants, etc. At first the Bolsheviks had demanded the calling of a democratically-elected Constituent Assembly to decide on the future constitution of Russia. Then in April 1917 they were popularising the slogan “All Power to the Soviets”, although this would have meant at that time power falling into the hands of the Mensheviks and Social Revolutionaries who had a majority on the Soviets. In July the Bolsheviks, believing that there was no longer a chance of splitting these groups from the openly capitalist parties abandoned their slogan of “All Power to the Soviets”,

ALLISONSMOM2002 ALLISONSMOM2002 · Answer 2 · 2019-11-28T14:26:46+01:00

Answer:

Typical

Explanation:

Sample Response: Samara's and Voronezh's views were typical of most Russian peasants. Many peasant bodies had already started to seize private property. Both assemblies wanted similar things: an end to private property and the transfer of land to the people.

What did you include in your response?

The assemblies’ views were typical.

Peasants began to take control of their land.

Peasants wanted an end to private property.