Respuesta :
Due to the Supreme Court's ruling that commodity akin to popular sovereignty was unconstitutional, hence i'll support.
What's the Supreme Court?
The United States Supreme Court is the loftiest court in the land and the only branch of the civil bar that the Constitution expressly authorizations. The number of Supreme Court judges isn't destined by the Constitution rather, it's determined by Congress.
" A negro, whose ancestors were transported into( theU.S.) and vended as slaves," whether enslaved or free, couldn't be an American citizen and, as a result, didn't have standing to file a action in civil court, according to the maturity. Taney rejected the case for lack of proper procedure because the Court demanded governance.
In addition, Taney claimed that the Missouri concession of 1820 was unconstitutional and banned Congress from releasing slaves located on civil lands. The opinion demonstrated respect for the Missouri courts' ruling that migrating to a free state didn't free Scott. In the end, Taney determined that the Fifth Amendment's description of property included slaves, and that any law that would deprive a slave proprietor of that property was unconstitutional.
Benjamin Robbins Curtis, writing in dissent, blamed Taney for addressing the substance of the issue after concluding that the Court demanded governance. He challenged Taney's assertion that the Authors unequivocally opposedanti-slavery measures by pointing out that rejecting the Missouri concession wasn't needed to settle the disagreement.
Like Curtis, John McLean believed that the maturity inaptly considered the claim's substance when its decision should have been confined to reuse. He said that since men of African heritage formerly had the right to bounce in five countries, they may qualify for citizenship.
Learn more about Supreme court's click here:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4