The reasonable person standard applies when the defendant could reasonably foresee how his conduct could cause harm or injury.
The legal test used to evaluate whether a defendant's actions were negligent is known as the reasonable person standard. The criterion is definable by a jury as a matter of fact and is objective. In order to determine what a reasonable person would have done in the same or similar circumstances, jurors weigh the evidence. The defendant's actions are compared to those of a reasonable person by the jury. The jury may conclude that the defendant violated the duty of care if the defendant's actions fell short of the required standard.
To learn more about reasonable person standard click here:
https://brainly.com/question/20629999
#SPJ4
