A counterclaim should be addressed in a rebuttal. The rebuttal should then explain why the counterclaim is false. It should incorporate bits of evidence with their sources to back them up.
In this case, the counterclaim asserts that golf is a sport that necessitates certain physical abilities. The reply, on the other hand, relates merely to the fact that golf needs some walking and intends to give the US Supreme Court as a supporting source, but the remark utterly misses the point: "it is ineffectual since it does not bring out a problem in the counterclaim." To refute a factual point, the author invokes a negative opinion from a third party (the United States Supreme Court.
To learn more about rebuttal from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/11770571
#SPJ9
