(a) briefly describe one crucial difference between nunn and qian's and lewis and maslin's historical interpretations of the columbian exchange (b) briefly explain how one specific historical event, development, or circumstance from 1491-1607 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support nunn and qian's argument. (c) briefly explain how one specific historical event, development, or circumstance from the period 1491-1607 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support lewis and maslin's argument these are short-answer questions from amsco united states history advanced placement edition (4th edition). i provided the prompts, and hopefully, i can get an answer soon. i also want to note that this textbook's answers are only given to the teacher (so students cant cheat), so it would help to see someone else's saq compared to mine. thanks!

Richards looks at the trade from the perspective of Native Americans, who were exploited and died as a consequence of the illnesses breakout (such as smallpox), whereas Nunn and Qian view it as a way for the Old World to advance technologically by using the items of the New World.

What are the particular historical events, developments, or circumstances that took place from 1491 until 1607?

It is well known that Nunn and Qian had a favorable influence in regards to the rich soil that brought about the rise in regards to economics and urbanization as it is an advantage to the Europeans.

A historical occurrence that is supposed to have been the event of the Spanish invasion of the Aztec kingdom is something that might help Richards with his views.

The problem of the ∨irginia corporation, which employs capitalism and amassed a significant amount of wealth in the new globe by means of the manufacturing of goods using slave labor, is the historical occurrence that might lend credence to the Nunn and Qian views.

Find out more about the historical event from the.

brainly.com/question/19578897

#SPJ1