He would argue that no consequences shall be considered, the duty itself should be followed.
What does Kant say about consequences?
Kant argues that no consequence can have fundamental moral worth; the only thing that is good in and of itself is the Good Will. The Good Will freely chooses to do its moral duty. That duty, in turn, is dictated solely by reason. The Good Will thus consists of a person's free will motivated purely by reason.
Why does Kant say consequences are not important?
Kant's theory is categorized as one that focuses on and evaluates 'intent' rather than consequences because consequences of our actions cannot always be controlled by us.
Learn more about Kant values:
brainly.com/question/1490267
#SPJ4
