Answer:
I think the answer is D
When an artist creates a representation of a historical event, he or she is likely to add details that will stir viewer’s emotions, even if some of those details have not been checked for accuracy.
Explanation:
1. Which of the following sources is more likely to include details that didn’t actually happen?
All of the above
a painting of an event that happened 50 years ago
a diary entry of someone who saw the event happen
a newspaper article written the day after the event occurred
A painting of an event that happened 50 years ago is more likely to include details that didn’t actually happen. Thus, option B is correct.
A source would be anything or anywhere where something originates, develops, or is acquired. A source gives us a lot of important details and information regarding the same.
Although some elements of a work of art depicting past events haven't been verified as accurate, the creator is unlikely to include information that will arouse the audience's sentiments and the way the people who were present know how they were feeling.
As the painting was created just on the basis of information and not on any live events that the artist has witnessed for himself. Therefore, option B is the correct option.
Learn more about sources, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1938772
#SPJ6
The question is incomplete, the complete question will be:
All of the above
a painting of an event that happened 50 years ago
a diary entry of someone who saw the event happen
a newspaper article written the day after the event occurred
