Respuesta :
Negotiators make use of the psychological principle known as the Condorcet paradox, which states that the outcomes of a majority rule election depend on the order in which the alternatives are presented when they plan to place their preferred alternatives on the ballot in later rounds of a sequential voting process.
The Marquis de Condorcet observed a phenomenon known as the Condorcet paradox in social choice theory, whereby aggregate preferences might be cyclical even while individual voter preferences are not. This is contradictory since it implies that the preferences of the majority may diverge: Consider a scenario in which the majority favors, respectively, candidates A and B over C and C over A. When this happens, it is because the opposing majorities are composed of various groups of people.
When there is a candidate who consistently receives a majority of the vote in head-to-head contests against all other candidates, or who is preferred by more voters than all other candidates combined, that candidate is elected using the Condorcet method. If an election system always selects the Condorcet winner when one exists, it meets the Condorcet winner criterion. When "majority rules" end up failing, Condorcet's paradox takes place.
To learn more about the Condorcet paradox:
https://brainly.com/question/15565938
#SPJ4
