Only if it is permitted by the moral code of the society of the agent of the act.
Franz Boas, a German-American anthropologist, developed the idea of cultural relativism as a tool for analysis around the beginning of the 20th century. Cultural relativism played a significant role in early social science to combat the ethnocentrism that frequently harmed research at the time, which was primarily carried out by white, affluent, Western men and frequently focused on people of color, foreign indigenous populations, and people from lower socioeconomic classes than the researcher. The act of assessing and evaluating another person's culture in light of one's own values and views is known as ethnocentrism. This perspective could lead us to frame other cultures as strange, exotic, fascinating, or even as issues that need to be resolved. In contrast, when we recognize that the many cultures of the world have their own beliefs, values, and practices that have developed in particular historical, political, social, material, and ecological contexts it makes sense that they would differ from our own and that none are necessarily right or wrong or good or bad, then we are engaging the concept of cultural relativism.
Therefore, according to cultural relativism, an act is morally right if and only if it is permitted by the moral code of the society of the agent of the act.
For more information on Cultural relativism, refer to the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/14980769
#SPJ4