Respuesta :
Answer:
No, I wouldn't lie. Even though the penalty for breaching a rule is severe, following the rules established by the leader is crucial. The social contract principle says that people agree to follow the rules set by the government in exchange for protection and other benefits. Lying goes against this idea.
Rather than risk my friend's wrongful imprisonment, it's in my best interest to disclose the truth in this situation. Even if you're lying to protect a buddy, the penalty is too harsh. Breaking the social bond and risking jail time or death is not worth it.
According to the Social Contract philosophy, it's not worth risking your own life for the sake of your buddy. The penalty for lying seems excessive in this instance.
Explanation:
This is my interpretation; you are free to alter it to your own satisfaction.
No, the theory requires that I don't tell a lie. Even though the punishment for breaking a rule is harsh, it is critical to obey the rules established by the leader.
What is a social contract theory?
According to the social contract idea, people commit to follow the regulations established by the government in exchange for protection and other advantages. Lying contradicts this notion.
Rather than risking my friend's unlawful imprisonment, I believe it is in my best interests to reveal the truth in this circumstance. Even if you're lying to protect a friend, the penalty is excessive. It is not worth breaking the social link and risking jail time or death.
It is not worth endangering your own life for the sake of your friend, according to the Social Contract ideology. In this case, the penalty for lying appears to be severe.
Learn more about social contracts at:
https://brainly.com/question/15087900
#SPJ1