Please Help! I'll mark brainliest! 20 points!
Q.1. Think of an example where a forester would be required to help determine public policy. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?

Q.2. If a source of information has bias, should professionals use the information? Explain your answer.

Q.3. Should all stakeholders’ opinions be valued equally? Explain your answer.

Q.4. Should nonprofit organizations have a role in determining policy in the forestry industry? Why or why not?

Q.5. Explain why it is important to understand human behavior as part of forestry. Describe a situation where understanding human behavior would be important in solving a potential forestry issue.

Respuesta :

Answer:

1)

2) It is not only important, it’s also the most ethical thing you can do if you are running a professional practice. Contrary to what most people believe, the bulk of customers will actually check the validity of your claims most of the time.

More reasons include:

By using credible sources, you are held in regard as an authority in whatever field you practice.

You earn more trust and respect from your audience and/or customers because you can back up your claims.

Evidence based practice is one of the best ways to earn recognition and mark your place among the best in your line of practice.

3) First, it has already been very clear that the latest round of companies’ being involved into the Xinjiang “forced labor” issue is part of the US-led Western forces’ political offensive against China, as I have explained in my answer of

Shou'en Li's answer to Is the US and her allies focused on Xinjiang hoping to derail the Belt and Road initiative?

And here in another answer, I also pointed out why and how they’ve been involved into the Western propaganda and economic war against China

Shou'en Li's answer to H&M vowed to build back trust in their China market. In your opinion, will they be able to do so or will their brand be ended in China?

BCI (Better Cotton Initiative), is financially supported by USAID,

4) As we consider evidence of how successful our ‘social organizations’ have been, how positive, edifying, uplifting, encouraging humanity has fared, through their ‘social organization’, one suggests there are a number of highly relevant characteristics missing in our equation! Why is it that we, the public, continuously elect, or allow, social homeopaths to dictate how our society functions. Why are we constantly stumbling from one war to the next, whilst politicians are spending billions of your and my taxpayer dollars, on more efficient weapons of mass destruction? Why do we allow such tools of mass murder be built? So, what is not so much the importance of social organizations, but the relevance of them, when we, through apathetic indifference, permit our social system being herded into the slaughtering ramp, when, if we chose, we could stand up, display some intestinal fortitude, declare that our, this society, social system is not going down the paths of the past, and start a positive, constructive, positive, peaceful community reality. So far, what is referred to, here, as social organization, has obviously failed miserably, so that social system is definitely of no social value.

5) not sure

ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE