contestada

NO LINKS PLEASE


W. K. Clifford argued that it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything on insufficient evidence. His critics have claimed that this argument fails owing to:

Group of answer choices


overgeneralization


improper use of the principle of sufficient reason


begging the question


post hoc, ergo propter hoc

Respuesta :

Clifford argued that it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything on insufficient evidence is an overgeneralization.

What is an argument?

It should be noted that an argument simply means the stance of a author regarding a particular work.

In this case, Clifford argued that it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything on insufficient evidence is an overgeneralization.

Learn more about arguments on:

https://brainly.com/question/3775579

ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE