This is how we can fill in the blanks to complete the passage describing the Know-Nothing political stance on immigration. I will topicalize the passage to improve readability:
- The Know-Nothing Party seemed to be one of contradictions: they wanted to limit the rights of immigrants, while promoting an (1) antislavery agenda. Why would a political party argue for limiting the rights of one group, but expanding the rights of another?
- While they did rally against certain groups, like (2) Catholics, it was mainly because these groups didn't support the same ideals for which they stood, including abolition and (3) temperance.
- Ultimately, the Know-Nothings accomplished very little in limiting the rights of immigrants. All European immigrants benefited from being (4) white. These groups had the advantage of being able to (5) vote, while free blacks could not.
Learn more about this topic here:
https://brainly.com/question/15439091