It is false to claim that in order to speak in public with a sympathetic audience, it is better to reason inductively, that is, to start with evidence and leave the conclusion last.
Using inductive reasoning in a speech is a more useful strategy when the speaker has to deal with a hostile audience, so inductive reasoning can help to dampen a conclusion by creating persuasion through data and evidence.
Therefore, when the audience is sympathetic, the speech can be made through deductive reasoning, which presents the premises that establish the conclusion, as there is a greater chance of public acceptance of your ideas that led to a certain conclusion.
Learn more here:
https://brainly.com/question/4615666
