1. The party that carries a benefit through proportional districting would be as follows:
- Yellow because the districts are equally divided.
2. The probable outcome in the gerrymandered map would be:
- Win of Green Party.
3. The argument that can be made against gerrymandering from the Yellow party would be:
- The alteration in the political boundaries is incorrect for serving personal political gains.
1). The party that carries a benefit in proportional districting would be the yellow party because it contains an equivalent break of districts which allows the voting process to take place justly.
2). The most likely outcome of the gerrymandered map would be the winning of the Green party and the probable cause behind this is that the green party has manipulated its boundaries unethically which increases the number of voters in its favor.
3). The argument that the chairperson of the Yellow party can make regarding the Green party is that it is inaptly increasing the number of voters in its region.
Learn more about "Gerrymander" here:
brainly.com/question/11558517