Why was congress so cooperative during Roosevelts first hundred days? Was it because the Democrats controlled congress?


What is congress dangerously reckless or courageously innovative?


Is the country best served when one party controls the presidency and Congress? Or is it better than the parties each control a brand?

Respuesta :

Answer:

Congress was so cooperative with Roosevelt during the first one hundred days because they were desperate and he was making grand promises. Congress was willing to give him more power because they believed he could, and would, save them from the depression. Democrats may have controlled congress but during that time your party didn't mean as much because everyone was working together to bring America back.

    Congress was dangerously reckless during this time. He was certainly courageous in his efforts and he acted as a great leader but, though he planned boldly, he did not plan successfully. He experimented alot and that may have been where he went wrong.

    The country is best served when both parties have influence because we don't want one to have more power than the other. If one party was in control completely then many people would be unhappy and the government would have some problems. Differing opinions, though they are aggravating, they are necessary for balance.

Explanation:

The reason why Congress was so cooperative during Roosevelt's first hundred days was:

  • They believed he could turn the tides of the Great Depression

Was it because the Democrats controlled Congress?

  • The cooperation was not as a result of party affiliation as everyone was working in the best interest of the country

The thing which Congress was so dangerously reckless or courageously innovative about was:

  • Backing Roosevelt because he gave bold promises

 

The question of whether the country is best served when one party controls the presidency and Congress is:

  • The country is best served when one party does not have the majority

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/19049704

ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE