If a supreme court justice believes that the constitution should be interpreted exactly as written, rather than examined in the context of the current social context, they would be advocating for Strict interpretation.
Does the Supreme Court make law or just interpret it?
Despite the fact that the supreme court may pay attention to an enchantment on any query of regulation provided it has jurisdiction, it normally does no longer preserve trials. Rather, the courtroom's venture is to interpret the meaning of the regulation, to decide whether a law is relevant to a selected set of statistics, or to rule on how the law ought to be implemented.
When the supreme court policies on a constitutional problem, that judgment is actually very last; its selections may be altered handiest by way of the hardly ever used method of constitutional change or via a new ruling of the court. But, whilst the court interprets a statute, new legislative action may be taken.
Learn more about the supreme court here: https://brainly.com/question/6111641
#SPJ2
