Which statement best explains whether Δ ABC is congruent to Δ DEF?





Question 10 options:

ΔABC is not congruent to ΔDEF because there is no sequence of rigid motions that maps ΔABC to ΔDEF.


ΔABC is congruent to ΔDEF because ΔABC can be mapped to ΔDEF by a reflection across the y-axis followed by a translation 5 units down.


ΔABC is congruent to ΔDEF because ΔABC can be mapped to ΔDEF by a translation 5 units down followed by a reflection across the x-axis.


ΔABC is congruent to ΔDEF because ΔABC can be mapped to ΔDEF by a translation 5 units down.

Which statement best explains whether Δ ABC is congruent to Δ DEF Question 10 options ΔABC is not congruent to ΔDEF because there is no sequence of rigid motion class=

Respuesta :

Happil

[tex]\triangle ABC[/tex] is congruent to [tex]\triangle DEF[/tex] because [tex]\triangle ABC[/tex] can be mapped to [tex]\triangle DEF[/tex] by a reflection across the [tex]y[/tex]-axis followed by a translation [tex]5[/tex] units down.

ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE

Otras preguntas