In paragraph 2 the author states that only one factor caused the Hindenburg's crash. Which part of the text best develops this claim?

A. The chain of events described in paragraph 5

B. Details provided in paragraph 2

C. Details provided in paragraph 9

D. The description of the Hindenburg in paragraph 4

Paragraph:
Not long after the Hindenburg crash-landed, people began conjecturing as to why this magnificent airship was destroyed in the blink of an eye. Theories have been proposed that blame lightning, its shiny skin, sabotage, static electricity, and even angry farmers shooting at the noisy monster scaring their cows. To this day, the National Hydrogen Society, which promotes hydrogen as a fossil fuel alternative, continues to insist that the highly flammable hydrogen gas that kept the Hindenburg afloat did not turn it into a hovering time bomb. The simple fact remains that only one thing brought this ship down— its use of hydrogen gas. It is extremely flammable and even mixing with oxygen will cause it to explode into billowing flames.

As per the subtleties presented in section 5, we can notice the activity of a submarine submerged in option D The description of the Hindenburg in paragraph 4.

What is context of excerpt?

This section likewise makes sense of why submarines can be handily gone after by a carrier, as they should be visible when they surface, as made sense of in the text.

Speculations have been recommended that fault lightning, its sparkling skin, harm, friction based electricity, and, surprisingly, furious ranchers taking shots at the loud beast startling their cows.

Right up to the present day, the National Hydrogen Society, which advances hydrogen as a non-renewable energy source elective, keeps on demanding that the exceptionally combustible hydrogen gas that kept the Hindenburg above water didn't transform it into a floating delayed bomb.

For more information about Hindenburg, refer the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/3037981

#SPJ2