A child was abducted from a local restaurant. Police closed the restaurant while they
processed the scene for evidence. As they neared the end of processing the crime
scene, another child was abducted in a park, not far away. Some of the evidence
from the two scenes appears similar, but other evidence is different. Police want to
keep the restaurant closed and look for new evidence later if the investigation
suggests they should. Which statement is true?

The police need a search warrant to continue searching the restaurant, according
to Mincey v. Arizona.

The police need to get a search warrant, according to Frye v. United States.

The police need to get a search warrant, according to Michigan v. Tyler.

The police do not need to get a search warrant, according to Daubert v. Merrell
Dow Pharmaceuticals.