Answer:
The argument "A) Setting a curfew is the first step in destroying democracy" would be a slippery slope fallacy because this type of fallacy claims that a series of random events would lead up to something major, such as "If you don't bring a pencil to school, you won't be able to write. If you can't write, you can't pass tests. If you can't pass tests, you'll get kicked out of school. If you get kicked out school, then...etc. etc." This will go on and on until the result is something tragic/drastic, such as "If you don't have a job, you'll starve to death. And nobody wants to starve to death." This is a quick (but slightly exaggerated) of the slippery slope fallacy. Hope this helps! :]
