NEED ASAP: According to the cartoon, how did the Supreme Court interpret the meaning of the Second Amendment in regards to a Chicago handgun ban?

a. The court used strict constructionism to uphold the right of the people to keep and bear arms and struck down a restriction on that right.

b. The court used loose constructionism to reinforce extensive regulation of arms by local, state, and federal authorities in order to maintain public safety.

c. The court determined that the Constitution’s Framers intended arms possession to be restricted to well-regulated militias subject to local, state, and federal authorities and that individual citizens do not have a right to keep arms.

d. The court ruled according to the Second Amendment’s original meaning that citizens’ right to keep arms was “necessary to the security of a free State” in the context of the nation’s historically weak military position following independence.

It makes the most sense. If you think about it, it is talking about upholding the second amendment. The part where it mentions a historically weak military position is referencing the Rev. War, where britain had us outnumbered in terms of numbers, but we still prevailed.

Answer Link

chilljain33 chilljain33 · Answer 2 · 2022-07-18T10:22:23+02:00

According to the cartoon given in the image attached, the Supreme Court gave the protection to the citizens from holding guns and arms as a necessity to the security of a free state.

What is the Second Amendment?

The Second Amendment of the American Constitution gives it's a citizens' protection against crime for acts done in the essence of a self-defense. One has the protection to keep arms for self-defense.

Hence, option D holds true regarding Second Amendment.

Learn more about Second Amendment here:

https://brainly.com/question/2950783

#SPJ2