Respuesta :
Answer:
The case pitted two accepted doctrines against one another—the individual's "right to privacy" and the "compelling and overriding interest" of a State. Roe v. Wade sought an extension of the "right to privacy," which the Court explicitly recognized for the first time in the case Griswold v. Connecticut, 1965.
Explanation:
pick me as the brainlooiest
The dual interest that the state had in Roe V Wade was:
- protecting the mother's health,
- protecting the life of the fetus.
The Roe versus Wade case was a case that involved the government. In this case the supreme court ruled that the government had no constitutional power to regulate abortion in the country.
It was ruled that those criminalizing abortion were going against a woman's right to privacy.
The case happened in the year 1970 after a woman sued the district attorney of Dallas.
The supreme court refused to agree with the woman's assertion that she had the right to terminate her pregnancy whenever she wanted.
But the court affirmed that a woman only had the right to so in her first trimester and not when it had gone past that stage.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/13116205?referrer=searchResults