Alshorouk Inc. is a small but growing company and is currently looking for to add a new site to its existing one. The factors for three locations are stated in the following table with a total sum of weights 100 and maximum score of 5 Factor Factor weight Loc1 Loc2 Loc3 Proximity to ports 15 3 4 4 Proximity to supplier 20 4 2 5 Facility with excess capacity 1 2 5 Facility with potential to expand 5 2 1 Close to highway 15 4 3 3 Environmental issues 10 3 4 3 a- If Alshrouk Inc. is targeting excess capacity, which location would be preferred if the weight of third factor is triple that of the fourth factor b- If shourok Inc is targeting future expansion, what would be the ratio between third and fourth factor to make loc1 preferable

Respuesta :

Answer:

Alshorouk Inc.

a) If Alshrouk Inc. is targeting excess capacity, the location that would be preferred if the weight of third factor is triple that of the fourth factor is:

Loc3

b- If Alshourok Inc is targeting future expansion, the ratio between third and fourth factor to make loc1 preferable would be:

1 : 3

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Total sum of weights = 100

Maximum score = 5 Factor

Factor weight                                Loc1  Loc2  Loc3

Proximity to ports (15)                      3        4         4

Proximity to supplier (20)                4        2         5

Facility with excess capacity           1         2         5

Facility with potential to expand     5        2         1

Close to highway (15)                      4        3         3

Environmental issues (10)               3        4         3

Total ascribed weight = 60 (15 + 20 + 15 + 10)

Unascribed weight for the third and fourth factors = 40 (100 - 60)

a- If Alshrouk Inc. is targeting excess capacity, which location would be preferred if the weight of third factor is triple that of the fourth factor

Third and fourth factor weights = 3 : 1

Third factor weight = 3/4 * 40 = 30

Fourth factor weight = 1/4 * 40 = 10

Factor weight                                          Loc1             Loc2          Loc3

Proximity to ports (15)                            45 (3*15)     60 (4*15)       60 (4*15)

Proximity to supplier (20)                      80 (4*20)    40 (2*20)     100 (5*20)

Facility with excess capacity (30)          30 (1*30)     60 (2*30)    150 (5*30)

Facility with potential to expand (10)    50 (5*10)     20 (2*10)       10 (1*10)

Close to highway (15)                            60 (4*15)     45 (3*15)       45 (3*15)

Environmental issues (10)                     30 (3*10)     40 (4*10)       30 (3*10)

Total weighted scores                        295            265                395

b) To make loc1 preferable, ratio of third and fourth factor would change to 1:3 and the total weighted scores would become:

Factor weight                                           Loc1             Loc2          Loc3

Proximity to ports (15)                             45 (3*15)     60 (4*15)       60 (4*15)

Proximity to supplier (20)                       80 (4*20)    40 (2*20)     100 (5*20)

Facility with excess capacity (10)            10 (1*10)      20 (2*10)      50 (5*10)

Facility with potential to expand (30)  150 (5*30)     60 (2*30)     30 (1*30)

Close to highway (15)                            60 (4*15)     45 (3*15)       45 (3*15)

Environmental issues (10)                     30 (3*10)     40 (4*10)       30 (3*10)

Total weighted scores                        375             265                315

ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE