In 1919, Charles Schenck was charged with violating the Espionage Act. The Supreme Court ruled that Schenck's actions created a "clear and present danger." How did the decision in this case affect the rights of U.S. citizens?
A. By establishing restrictions on the right
to vote
B. By protecting the freedoms of religious
minorities
C. By placing limits on freedom of
expression
D. By protecting the rights of accused
persons

According to this act if a person gives any data associated with the U.S armed troops or supports the country's enemy by any means will be held criminal.

Freedom of expression or speech is a practice where individuals or the citizenry have the liberty to express their opinions without fear of punishment.

The correct answer is:

Option C. By placing limits on freedom of expression.

The explanation of the answer is:

Charles Schenck was general secretary of the U.S. party charged with the plot of violating the act in the year 1919.

He was pronounced accusable of hindering the military enlistments and defiance in the military.

The ruling, in this case, affects the liberties of freedom of expression of U.S. citizens.

This judgment made clear that freedom of expression can be limited if they bring any infliction or threat to the country and its people.

Therefore, the Supreme Court's decision, in this case, limits freedom of expression.

To learn more about freedom of expression and the Espionage Act follow the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/397185