Both "Rising from the Ashes" and "The Great Fire" discuss the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, but the texts do not always agree. What are two matters of fact or interpretations of events, related to the Great Chicago Fire, that the texts disagree on? Use evidence from each text to support your analysis.

Respuesta :

Answer:

they disagree on the fact that chicago is going to get rebuilt

Explanation:

chicago got messed up pretty bad but some people want to rebuild it and some don'y.

The two matters of fact or interpretations of events, related to the Great Chicago Fire, that "Rising from the Ashes" and "The Great Fire" both disagree on is:

  • They disagree on whether Chicago would be rebuilt

According to the given questions, we are asked to show the way the two given texts disagree on matters relating to the Great Chicago Fire.

As a result of this, we can see that the two texts both disagree on the matter of rebuilding Chicago after the Great Chicago FIre had damaged the city's infrastructure.

Some people were of the opinion that the city should be rebuilt, while some felt that Chicago was already destroyed and what was left should not be rebuilt.

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/21181919

ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE