Which response best explains how author Mark O’Mara aims to improve society in the article "Gun Debate? What Gun Debate?"

A-O’Mara presents new evidence about the usefulness of guns in society in order to help gun advocates and opponents find a measure of common ground.

B-O’Mara shows the strengths of both sides of the American gun debate to help gun advocates and opponents find a measure of common ground.

C-O’Mara reviews the arguments of gun-rights advocates in depth in order to use emotional appeals to persuade the audience of the devastation of gun violence.

D-O’Mara puts statistics about gun deaths in a new light in order to shock readers into acknowledging the devastation of gun violence.

From the article, "Gun Debate? What Gun Debate?", Mark O'Mara makes an argument about the gun problem in America. He believes that while gun-rights advocates argue that gun control would be an infringement on their rights to self-defense as enshrined in the Second Amendment, they have ignored the fact that there have been quite a number of gun-related deaths, more especially in schools.

He brings the statistic of the number of gun-related deaths each year which according to him is at 300,000 deaths per year and putting it in perspective, America lost 60,000 soldiers in the Vietnam war.