Discuss the conclusions you can draw from thinking about how history is told. Consider how historians are persuaded by their own biases, motivations, and influences of their time.

It is always a concern about the historians that to what extent they can remain unaffected from their surrounding while writing history. And ancient history was marked by despotic rule where any criticism about the head of the state and strong institution would immediately deal with harsh punishment. Moreover, the credibility of historians can be doubted when we study that they were dependent on the royal patronage and therefore have worked to legitimate the royal authority.

Martebi Martebi · Answer 2 · 2021-12-14T17:44:35+01:00

History is never ending. There are different multiple conclusions that can drawn from history as it is, History they say do repeats itself. It is new everyday and never ending.

A lot of historians analyzed events have been known to have a little form of biases. They cannot be insolated from biases but they in some ways learn from it.

A lot of times, bad treatment in the past are the result of historians' bias. They give some measures of bias in evidence, and sometimes explain it when reconstructing the events of the past.

They are only pursuaded if it does not occur because the historian wants the outcome she has produced to take place.

Learn more about Historians from

https://brainly.com/question/24466312