Which of the following would be a valid impossibility defense? A) What the defendant plans to do to the victim is not a criminal act. B) The bank closes before the defendant can rob it. C) The victim does not show up at the ambush point. D) The poison is not strong enough to kill the victim.

Respuesta :

The valid impossibility defense here would be:  What the defendant plans to do to the victim is not a criminal act.

What is a valid impossibility defense?

This is an act in the legal terms that talks about actions that are impossible to commit legally.

It is a defense that is said for a person that is on trial for a criminal action. The action of the defendant on the victim can not be said to be illegal.

Read more on the impossibility act here: https://brainly.com/question/7306383

ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE
ACCESS MORE